February 07, 2010

The Past as Placeholder

Recently, I went up to Berkeley for a weekend, and was perversely weirded out by how unweird the whole experience was. I was bracing myself for that shock of loss, the consciousness of a gaping void where things used to be. The hours I spent trekking through old haunts with old friends, however, were surprisingly free of emotional turmoil. I had a bagel at Noah's, wandered into the Main Stacks, hiked up the big hill leading to the chemistry plaza, and essentially traced out the familiar routes I took to and from and between classes for years, stopping for lunch at the Free Speech Movement café (and actually landing a table inside). Following my graduation at the end of May, I hadn't set foot in the Bay Area until this recent trip, a span of just about seven months. But for all I registered, I might have been returning from winter break, whiling away some time on campus waiting for my next class to begin.

It's a little alarming, actually. I think that I have yet to achieve the necessary degrees of separation to view college as a part of my past; I can't enter nostalgia proper because I haven't accepted the passage of time. This is a muddled theory, however, because I understand nostalgia as a longing for an idealized version of the past, and certainly my memories of college are pleasantly cloaked in idealization. I recall the stress and scheduling and lack of sleep with a fondness that can only be accessed after the fact. And yet, there is no relinquishment of the experience: I feel like it is still mine to live and breathe, even as I live and breathe something entirely different.

Perhaps in order to mourn the past and move on, we need to replace it with a concrete present. I have been existing in limbo these months, indulging in the escapism of novels and movies and TV shows and waiting for life (read: school) to begin again; my failure to let go of Berkeley is akin to using it as a placeholder. But this stopgap mindset is problematic in itself, suggesting as it does that I have learned to recognize only some tasks/events/experiences as life, dismissing all the rest as breaks. Basically, I'm still running on the academic calendar, which raises the question of what will happen when I finally emerge from the cocoon of academia and into the so-called "real world." Will I perpetually be waiting to return to school?

This is all very worrisome, but time is on my side right now (or I am on the right side of time). Thank goodness for higher education! It can more or less fit into the mold left by undergraduate studies, preserving the structure until school is finally, finally done. I am a firm proponent of avoidance as a legitimate approach to facing problems (or not facing them, as the case may be). That trickier transition to the working world, the complete reorganization of life and outlook, and the inevitable forced confrontation with the meaning of it all, I'll deal with when I have to. (And of course, I could always be a professor.)

January 30, 2009

When in Disgrace

This is a landmark entry, and not just because it's the first one in more than a year (how disgraceful). This week I just finished reading the first substantial piece of nonfiction that I have ever read for pleasure, a biography called Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. With so many books on my metaphorical nightstand (not to mention a thesis that I have yet to begin writing), I suppose it's rather strange that I chose this particular moment to begin my foray into biography. That I did so is probably due to a combination of factors: I saw the book while restlessly roaming the student bookstore, itching to buy something; I'm passionately fond of Shakespeare, and was unfortunately unable to take the second half of the yearlong survey course (which I'm still bitter about, by the way); and I recognized the author, Stephen Greenblatt, as a well-known Shakespeare scholar and the editor of The Norton Shakespeare.

The book is brilliant. Greenblatt takes what could be construed as a dangerous approach, interweaving his own insightful analysis with passages from Shakespeare's plays, sonnets, and other poems, and using all these texts as sources of or support for his assertions. The danger of this strategy lies in the possibility of reducing the person (the playwright, the poet) to his works, which would be to demean the great imaginative achievement of writing fiction in the first place, but Greenblatt deftly avoids that pitfall. He never mistakes the myriad of characters that Shakespeare created with their creator, but rather speculates intelligently about the circumstances and considerations that could have resulted in their creation.

What emerges is an incisive, engaging narrative of one possible life that William Shakespeare could have led. I know that this account may be entirely incorrect, but somehow that does not detract from its charm. Perhaps the book is the more poignant for its underlying uncertainty, the illusory quality of its subject, a writer we can only glimpse through the illusions he imagined for his own time, but which have outlasted him into ours.

We are such stuff
As dreams are made on, and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.
(The Tempest 4.1.56-58).